Does Ontology Matter?
نویسنده
چکیده
In this paper, I argue that various disputes in ontology have important ramifications and so are worth taking seriously. I employ a criterion according to which whether a dispute matters depends on how integrated it is with the rest of our theoretical projects. Disputes that arise from previous tensions in our theorizing and have additional implications for other issues matter, while insular disputes do not. I apply this criterion in arguing that certain ontological disputes matter; specifically, the disputes over concrete possible worlds and coincident material objects. Finally, I consider how one could show that some ontological disputes do not matter, using a Platonism/nominalism dispute as an example.
منابع مشابه
The meaning of place, A constant or changing quality? Lynch,Rapoport and Semiotics view points
The matter of meaning in place, is one of the main qualities of human life. People consciously or unconsciously looking for meanings in places. The importance of finding the meaning of place is that, Understanding the meaning will lead to “act” in place. Finding the place friendly, or finding it insecure will lead to act differently. Now the question is that, is the meaning of place, something ...
متن کاملOntology-Driven Information Integration
The integration of information of different kinds, such as spatial and alphanumeric, at different levels of detail is a challenge. While a solution is not reached, it is widely recognized that the need to integrate information is so pressing that it does not matter if detail is lost, as long as integration is achieved. This paper shows the potential for extraction of different levels of informa...
متن کاملWhat is Formal Ontology
After briefly addressing the origin of the word ontology, I will ask what formal ontology might be. I will first argue that formal ontology is not the same as formalized or general ontology. In order to understand the meaning of the epithet “formal,” I will then look for a suitable way of distinguishing form from matter. Formal ontology will be shown to be formal insofar as it does not refer to...
متن کاملThe water falls but the waterfall does not fall: New perspectives on objects, processes and events
We challenge the widespread presumption that matter and objects are ontologically prior to processes and events, and also the less widespread but increasingly popular view that processes and events are ontologically prior to matter and objects. Instead we advance a third view according to which each of these pairs of categories is ontologically dependent on the other. In particular, taking a cu...
متن کاملThe Role of Definitions in Construction and Analysis of Formal Ontologies
In this paper I make the case that formal characterisation of large conceptual vocabularies does not require the specification of large numbers of axioms but can be carried out primarily in terms of definitions. Axioms should be confined to describing the logical properties of a relatively small core of primitives. I examine some technical meta-logical notions and theorems relating to definitio...
متن کامل